You May be Entitled to Significant Compensation Asbestos containing talc. Johnson & Johnson powders were proven to contain asbestos (a cancer causing agent) and the company failed to notify users of the cancer risk. $2 BILLION has already been awarded to claims. Free To File! No Fees Unless A Settlement Is Awarded!

J&J’s proposed settlement with talc would pay $400 million to US state AGs. Asbestos Containing Talc .

Johnson & Johnson (JNJ.N) has set aside $400 million to resolve U.S. state consumer protection actions as part of a broader $8.9 billion deal to settle allegations that its Baby Powder and other talc-based product causes cancer. Asbestos containing talc.

J&J company subsidiary LTL Management filed a bankruptcy plan in New Jersey late on Monday that outlines how the firm intends to pay different types of cancer patients in an arrangement for bankruptcy. Asbestos containing talc. J&J has claimed that its Talc products are safe, and will not cause cancer. It is attempting for another time to settle more than 38,000 lawsuits filed in bankruptcy and stop new cases from coming forward in the near future.
LTL’s bankruptcy plan will pay $400 million to an additional trust to settle lawsuits filed with state attorneys general alleging that J&J had violated the state’s unfair commercial practices as well as consumer protection laws by misleading consumers regarding the dangers of its talc products.

Some states had started consumer protection cases against J&J prior to the time that LTL’s bankruptcy filing prevented these investigations from progressing in 2021. Asbestos containing talc. New Mexico and Mississippi had already brought suit in the past against Johnson & Johnson before then and states like Arizona, Maryland, North Carolina, Texas and Washington had issued subpoenas or civil investigative demands, according to LTL’s court filings.

New Mexico and Mississippi have filed a petition to end LTL’s bankruptcy in a joint move with cancer victims and those affected by cancer and the U.S. Justice Department’s watchdog on bankruptcy, who argue that a profit-making company like J&J can’t benefit from bankruptcy protections meant for the struggling debtors.
LTL’s first attempt at resolving the bankruptcy lawsuits was dismissed following similar arguments, when a U.S. appellate court decided in favor of LTL did not have “financial financial distress” and therefore not eligible to receive bankruptcy relief. Asbestos containing talc. LTL declared bankruptcy a second time in just two hours following the decision to dismiss, arguing that its second attempt was different due to the fact that it was able to borrow less and more backing for a settlement.

New Mexico and Mississippi said in their motion for dismissal that LTL’s bankruptcy renewal violates state law enforcement powers by attempting unilaterally to cap LTL’s liability to state consumer protection actions.

Asbestos Containing Talc

LTL’s filings for the new year also contained more information about the way in which the company will evaluate and pay claims for cancer if the bankruptcy plan is approved.

The highest payments under the settlement would be $500,000 to those diagnosed with mesothelioma terminal prior to age 45 and $260,000 for those who have been diagnosed with advanced ovarian cancer prior to age 45.

The proposed settlement applies discounts depending on the nature and severity of cancer, an individual’s years of age, their history of the use of talc, and other aspects. Asbestos containing talc. For instance the case of a woman who used daily talc products, had an ancestral history of ovarian cancer and was diagnosed the stage 2 ovarian cancer when she was 55 may be eligible for a $21,125 payment under the program.

Judge ordains J&J, talc opponents to engage in settlement talks.

Following another round of hearings in Johnson & Johnson’s attempt to implement a Texas Two-Step bankruptcy strategy to settle talc lawsuits and federal bankruptcy judge Michael Kaplan has ordered the company as well as those who oppose the plan to hold talks to reach a settlement, Bloomberg reports.

In its second bankruptcy effort for LTL Management, a subsidiary created by J&J to settle claims – the company proposed a settlement of $8.9 billion. Asbestos containing talc. While one group of law firms representing plaintiffs supports the offer, another group is against the settlement.

Earlier this week, the opposition group, known as the Official Committee of Talc Claimants in the bankruptcy court, demanded to dismiss the case asserting that LTL can not be considered to be in financial trouble.

“The filing is an unjust and legally flawed attempt by a tiny number of law firms to stop claimants from voting on the resolution plan, a plan the vast and growing majority of claimants approve of,” J&J’s litigation chief Erik Haas, said in an announcement. Asbestos containing talc. “The law firms involved in this filing have financial interests that clash with, differ from and infringe on the rights that their customers. We will be submitting a response an appeal to the appellate court.”

Asbestos containing talc. Clay Thompson, a lawyer for MRHFM who boasts more than mesothelioma clients who have filed lawsuits against J&J, said that J&J’s second bankruptcy attempt will fail.

“J&J sends out press releases describing how fantastic its plans are, but is demanding that plan details–including what each sick person will receive–be kept secret,” Thompson said in a statement. “What do they have to hide?”

Kaplan has directed the parties to develop a new restructuring plan, with supervision from two mediators.

As of February 2022 Kaplan affirmed the ability of J&J’s recourse to Chapter 11 to hasten a settlement that would release J&J from the hundreds of thousands of claims related to its talcum-based products.

But in January of this year an appeals court in the United States overturned the verdict, ruling that the firm could not be considered in “financial difficulty.”

In the event that J&J’s request to make an appeal before the U.S. Supreme Court was rejected at the end of April J&J applied for its first bankruptcy just two hours after. In response, Kaplan froze the lawsuits for 60 days, allowing the company to decide whether to grant an additional bankruptcy.

J&J’s unstoppable profit machine sputters after $6.9B talc litigation charge.

With the 2 Chapter 11 attempts, J&J has purchased 19 months of which cases were placed held. Asbestos containing talc. The company would like claimants to take a vote to accept their settlement. J&J needs 75% support in order for the agreement to be accepted.

In addition to the gang of talc lawyers who criticised the bankruptcy of the company in the U.S. Trustee, the U.S. Trustee which is a division from the U.S. Department of Justice is also submitting an appeal to dismiss LTL’s second bankruptcy case.

In a letter filed this week, U.S. trustee Andrew R. Vara wrote that the doors of the bankruptcy court remain “open to honest but unfortunate debtors.” Those doors “are not available to anyone who do not have a legitimate bankruptcy goal or who seek to take advantage of the bankruptcy process to hinder or delay their creditors,” Vara continued.

In its own words, J&J maintains there is no proof conclusive that their Talc-based products, such as the famous baby powder, can cause cancer. J&J has adopted the products from the market and will first launch them to be available in North America in 2020–and the rest of the world this year.

J&J wants to avoid the expense of going to trial. It has won most of the cases that have been resolved in court, however some losses have been punitive.
A high-profile trial in Missouri ended in an $4.7 billion verdict against the drug company and was later lowered to $2.1 billion after appeals.

Johnson & Johnson faces high-stakes hearing over ‘Texas Two Step’ talc strategy: report
In all, J&J has lost nine trial involving talc that are appealing or resolved. In 41 trials 32 have ended in a win by J&J as well as mistrials or plaintiff verdict that was reversed in appeal. Asbestos containing talc. Separately, the company in 2020 negotiated to settle more than 1,000 cases worth 100 million dollars, Bloomberg announced at that time.

Talcum Baby Powder Ovarian Cancer Lawsuit – Asbestos Containing Talc

Our lawyers are handling baby powder cases in all 50 states. The talcum powder lawsuits for Johnson & Johnson have been ongoing for years. Asbestos containing talc. The lawsuits assert that long-term use of the powder (or “talc”), the active ingredient in many products, including the Baby Powder and Shower to Shower, can cause ovarian cancer in some women.

This page provides the J&J Talc Power litigation update and discusses how the upcoming bankruptcy ruling will affect the final settlement amounts of these ovarian cancer lawsuits.

Have you reached the deadline by which you to file a talcum powder lawsuit? Many who believe the time limit has expired to file a lawsuit against Johnson & Johnson are wrong. Contact us now at 800-553-8082 or get a free and quick case review online.

Johnson and Johnson Talcum Powder Lawsuit Update 2023 – Asbestos Containing Talc

June 2 2023 Update: In the trial for asbestos-containing talc which took place in California yesterday, technical issues halted the opening statement by the defense lawyers. Asbestos containing talc. Jurors watching from their homes via Zoom but did not hear Johnson &Johnson’s lawyer express doubts about the 70s research asserting the presence of asbestos in their product, but the trial was abruptly closed.

Meanwhile, the plaintiff had the opportunity to introduce the first of their witnesses, Arthur Langer. Langer said that the presence of other minerals alongside the talc’s mineral content is inevitable. He testified that his team informed J&J in the year 1971 of the presence of chrysotile asbestos in the talc manufactured by the company, though at lower than 0.1 percent. He also uncovered more asbestos in the year 1976.

June 1st, 2023 Update: Asbestos containing talc. This is the first court trial that has taken place since J&J took the decision to disband its Talc division and declare bankruptcy marks an important turning point in the ongoing talc litigation story. The trial began on Tuesday in the tragic case of a young 24-year-old plaintiff who was diagnosed with a rare and aggressive form of mesothelioma earlier this year. an illness that lawyers on both sides believe is a grave tragedy.

Opening statements revealed the distinct differences between each side’s story. The plaintiff’s attorney took aim against Johnson & Johnson, alleging the use of deceptive tactics in research practices and throughout the litigation process. As per the lawyer Johnson & Johnson attempted to alter the definition of asbestos, in spite of internal documents from 1998 and 1994 that show asbestos fibers in the tissue of the plaintiff are included.

Johnson & Johnson’s uncertain $8.9 billion settlement deal hangs in the balance as we progress of this trial. Despite the particularity of the mesothelioma trial and its unique challenges compared to other lawsuits involving talcum powder and a decision in favor of the plaintiff could result in a serious setback to J&J’s hopes of broad acceptance of their settlement proposal among plaintiffs.

May 31 2023 Update: Johnson and Johnson’s bankrupt talc unit was able to defend its two-time Chapter 11 filing in the face of challenges from talc injury claimants. In an appeal to the New Jersey bankruptcy court, the company argued that the situation differed fundamentally from the previous filing. It also emphasized the unprecedented commitment to $8.9 billion to J&J as the largest settlement ever made in the history of a mass tort bankruptcy. Asbestos containing talc. The issue is not discussed: whether the amount of the settlement means it is a fair settlement. J&J also claimed support from various plaintiffs’ law firms that represent over 600,00 claimants. This is difficult to verify however it is likely to be incorrect.

May 24 2023 Update: In the wake of Johnson & Johnson’s bankruptcy in 2021 filing, the first trial on its cosmetic talc products allegedly with asbestos content is scheduled to start jury selection Monday, May 24, California in Alameda County Superior Court, which is a well-known place for plaintiffs. Plaintiff claims that mesothelioma is the result of asbestos exposure from J&J’s products which the company is denying. The trial also includes six retailers who are accused of selling talc-based products.

May 22nd, 2023 Update: Lawyers in the 2nd J&J Talc bankruptcy are disputing who should be chosen to fill the post of future claims representative, the role is crucially important to resolving the talc claims. Asbestos containing talc. Randi Ellis, a lawyer who is frequently involved in MDLs across the country was appointed the claims representative in the initial bankruptcy. J&J’s defense group wants Ellis to be appointed to that role in the future, however lawyers representing the talc plaintiffs are protesting on the grounds that Ellis has conflicts of interest which should stop her from assuming that position for the second time. The issue stems from the reality that Ellis was believed to have been involved in the drafting of the highly contested second bankruptcy, raising doubts about her capability to remain neutral. The reality is the bankruptcy will be dismissed regardless.

May 17, 2023 Update The pretend company that J&J created for the talc litigation bankruptcy disclosed to the New Jersey bankruptcy court that they have allocated $400 million as a settlement for claims of states that accuse the company of deceptive advertising for its talc products. Asbestos containing talc. This amounts to an $8.5 billion settlement to cancer victims. It’s difficult to envision an eventuality where J&J will be able to push the baby powder settlements given these numbers. While J&J’s $8.5 billion offer might seem like a lot of money at first, it does not look great after you calculate the figures. The settlement plan based on our estimates – will not offer victims anything more than $100,000 per instance. This isn’t enough.

May 15th, 2023 Update: J&J might be facing suit from an advocacy group that represents cancer victims. Asbestos containing talc. The group argues that J&J deliberately retracted a $61.5 billion funding agreement in conjunction with its affiliate, LTL Management LLC, to simulate financial distress and validate the unit’s Chapter 11 bankruptcy filing. The group claims this decision is equivalent to a fraudulent transfer of victims’ compensation rights. They will investigate J&J’s actions in the wake of the decision to dismiss the first bankruptcy case of LTL.

May 10 2023 Update: The following week, this week the U.S. Bankruptcy Court in New Jersey will hear oral arguments in a motion reject the second bankruptcy filing from J&J subsidiaries LTL Management. In the meantime, this bankruptcy court has issued an Order requiring both sides to participate in a settlement mediation in the hope that an international settlement agreement can be come to fruition.

May 5th, 2023: Update on Talc producer Whittaker, Clark & Daniels filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy due to numerous lawsuits alleging that its Talc products caused cancer from asbestos exposure. Asbestos containing talc. More than 2700 people have filed lawsuits against the company, and it was spending $1 million a month on legal defense. The company’s recent $29million settlement at the Supreme Court of South Carolina forced it to seek bankruptcy protection, arguing for an equitable distribution of assets among talc claimants instead of being taken from the receiver. Other suppliers of talc have declared bankruptcy because of lawsuits.

May 4 2023 Update U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Michael Kaplan has directed Johnson & Johnson to resume talks with lawyers who rebuffed the company’s proposed $8.9 billion settlement offer. In Trenton, New Jersey yesterday the parties gathered in court to discuss the next steps to take in another bankruptcy proceeding and Judge Kaplan encouraged further settlement talks.

This is the solution to resolve these claims for J&J. A baby powder settlement can be completed. Asbestos containing talc. But it will require additional money – perhaps billions of dollars of Johnson & Johnson.

Lawyers are split on whether to take the proposal or not and not every client views the issue the same way their lawyer does. This second case of bankruptcy is expected to fail, as Judge Kaplan has set a date for a hearing in June to decide whether to close the case for the third time.

May 3, 2023 Update: A group of cancer patients who have sued Johnson & Johnson (J&J) demanded an order from the Third Circuit halt the bankruptcy filed by J&J subsidiary LTL Management, claiming it attempts to block litigation over talc products. The group representing the claimants has filed a motion this week requesting for the Third Circuit to consider their case and then send it back before a court of lower jurisdiction with instructions for dismissing the bankruptcy. Asbestos containing talc. They also requested that the stoppage of tort litigation against J&J continue to continue.
LTL applied for Chapter 11 protection once again after its bankruptcy filing was rejected in the Third Circuit earlier this year with the possibility of an $8.9 billion settlement. The committee argues that the recent decision allowing LTL’s third Chapter 11 to continue, while also halting trials against J&J, warrants the immediate Third Circuit review. The US Trustee also asked that an New Jersey bankruptcy court dismiss the LTL bankruptcy case. J&J’s global vice-president of litigation Erik Haas, was quoted by Bloomberg saying that J&J intends to file a response to the appeals court calling the request an “desperate and legally flawed plan” by a handful of law firms with competing financial interests.
May 1 2023 Update: A most frequently asked question is how could plaintiffs and their lawyers turn down $8.9 billion. That’s of course a lot of money. But there are plenty of victims. Asbestos containing talc. They are a great cases for plaintiffs. We were reminded of this last week in two talc trials which have resulted in huge verdicts for plaintiffs. In February the mesothelioma case involving talcum powder trial in Oregon was settled with a verdict worth $18.1 million. In the same month, a different mesothelioma talc case was brought to trials within South Carolina and resulted in an award of $29 million on behalf of the plaintiff. Both cases were defended by Whittaker, Clark & Daniels Inc., one of the top producers of talc in the U.S.
April 30th 2023 Update: When J&J initially tried to take the litigation over talcum powder into bankruptcy, it was met with an offer to reserve $2 billion to settle the case. This was an absurdly low amount. The talc plaintiffs had not agreed with the proposal. This time, however, J&J has increased the offer to $8.9 If the talc plaintiffs accept a bankruptcy settlement and they have the support of a large segment of the talc plaintiffs and their attorneys. Asbestos containing talc. But 75% of the talc plaintiffs, which is required to approve bankruptcy plans is not an easy task with so many lawyers with vast collections of baby powder lawsuits that are opposed towards the agreement.

What are the solutions to the impasse? More billions.
April 25, 2023 Update Talc Cancer victims have sought a court order to disqualify the Chapter 11 case filed by LTL Management LLC, a absurdly made-up Johnson & Johnson subsidiary, which claims that the business is not financially strained. LTL has filed for Chapter 11 to settle tens of thousands of claims that J&J’s baby powders cause cancer. Asbestos containing talc. In the end, however, the 3rd Circuit dismissed its first Chapter 11 case in January, saying LTL was not a candidate for bankruptcy relief as it failed to show financial trouble.

The claimants assert that LTL’s Second Chapter 11 case is an overreach of the bankruptcy system and it is being pursued in bad faith. J&J says the bankruptcy settlement has “significant backing” from firms representing about 60,000 potential claimants. It is fair to say that lawyers representing plaintiffs and the victims are split over the $8.9 billion amount of settlement offered.

April 21st, 2023 Update: A bankruptcy judge has ruled the company Johnson & Johnson must face new lawsuits claiming that the company sold a baby powder that contained a chemical that causes cancer. Even though trials for the talc lawsuits have been suspended for at least 60 days and new lawsuits are able to be filed, and lawyers can begin preparing their cases. Asbestos containing talc. Judges expressed doubt about J&J’s pathetic attempt to revive its strategy with a second bankruptcy case.

April 13, 2023 Update: biggest update is about the $8.9 billion over 25 years settlement offer. Lawyers representing cancer victims in MDL class action MDL class action have vowed to fight the settlement alongside talc claimants. Why? They believe it’s not enough to pay for 70,000 victims who have cancer. Asbestos containing talc. These lawyers argue that J&J should negotiate a larger settlement or settle individual claims if the latest bankruptcy is dismissed.

But there’s a separate set of lawyers who are not part of the top leadership in that class action. The lawyers collectively have accumulated tens of thousands of cases. They want to settle the case now in what many believe to be far less than what these victims deserve. Their argument seems to be two-fold. The first is that they claim the settlement of around 100,000 dollars per plaintiff is fair.

This is an argument that is difficult to present. However, their second argument has more substance: the victims will be no longer patient and demand the money immediately.

April 12 2023 Update: Some people are asking how J&J can go through bankruptcy again. The answer is complicated and convoluted. However, let’s attempt to explain it simply.
Johnson & Johnson asserts that bankruptcy is the only way to resolve both current and future talc litigations in a definitive manner. It thinks it can get a lower rate when there is a bankruptcy element that creates pressure to settle. Asbestos containing talc. Going back to 400 years of American past, the company asserts that bankruptcy benefits all parties as it distributes settlement payments more equitably and effectively than trial courts, in which some litigants receive substantial settlements while others get nothing.

The basic tenet of this 3rd Circuit decision was this is not a case – one that makes a profit, but a subsidiary to take the legal responsibility and declare bankruptcy Congress thought of when drafting its Bankruptcy Code. But it also said it was not in financial difficulty due to the fact that J&J promises unlimited funding.
So J&J decided to go with the funding unlimited part of the deal but did not pledge to fund unlimited litigation. J&J claims that its modified financing arrangements with its subsidiary address appeals court’s concerns, while offering claim payment funds. In the hope that offering victims less money would solve the underlying issue.

Attorneys representing cancer patients who do not agree with the agreement counter the agreement with what is a defense against legal nonsense by pointing out legal absurdity: J&J fraudulently transferred $50 billion of assets away from LTL Management to circumvent the appeals court’s previous decision. Hyperbole is not exempt the lawyers representing victims call it the most significant “fraudulent transaction ever in United States history.”

In spite of the legal jargon, J&J does not really believe that this bankruptcy will last. However, it’s a means to push for this $8.9 billion settlement, and to keep pressure on plaintiffs.

April 10, 2023 update: Bloomberg provides an insightful report on a brand new law that has been passed in New Jersey that is shedding new light on litigation funding in the baby powder class action lawsuit. Funders for litigation Virage Capital Management and TRGP Capital invested in hundreds of lawsuits against Johnson & Johnson (J&J) regarding talc products, in exchange for a share of any winnings. J&J is now willing that it will pay $8.9 billion in settlements for all lawsuits.

The involvement of the funders is publicly available due to a New Jersey court rule requiring the disclosure of certain information about outside funding backers. The rule aims to respond to the increasing calls for regulation of litigation funders. J&J is facing more than 60,000 claims when you take into account federal and state child powder-related lawsuits. Third-party funding for mass tort lawsuits has both pros and cons. There is no doubt that we are seeing how third-party funding could level the playing field between individual as well as large corporations in the courtroom.

April 4 2023 Update: It is fun to watch the worm turning in this legal battle. J&J has taken another blow this week when they were denied by the Third Circuit denied J&J’s request to continue the automatic stay in the meantime that J&J appeals a bankruptcy decision in the U.S. Supreme Court. The automatic stay has frozen the cases of talcum powder in a number of years and stopped new lawsuits from arising ever since J&J launched the controversial attempt to spin talc-related liabilities into a bankrupt subsidiary more than a year earlier. Asbestos containing talc. When the 3rd Circuit ruled that this bankruptcy was invalid a few months ago, the stay was removed. J&J wanted to see it remain in effect until an appeal to the SCOTUS appeal. The answer was no.
April 1st, 2023 Update Johnson & Johnson announced it will appeal its 3rd Circuit bankruptcy loss to the U.S. Supreme Court last week. The likelihood that is that the Supreme Court is willing even to hear the appeal? Low.
March 16 2023 Update: With the bankruptcy stay being officially lifted, the very first new cases were filed and incorporated into the talcum powder class action MDL in just over a year. Seven new talc-related lawsuits were brought into the MDL over the last month increasing the number of cases that are pending to 37,522.

February 25 2023 Update 2023 Update: A Congressmen from Tennessee is now calling for the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) launch an investigation into how much J&J products containing talc have cost the government over the decades.
Recently, in an open letter addressed to the GAO, Rep. Steven Cohen (D-Ten.) has accused J&J of ignoring the risks of its talc-based products for decades while tax dollars were used to treat those who were injured through exposure to the products. The lawsuit comes just a few weeks after J&J’s loss to the 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals.

Asbestos containing talc. J&J should begin to make reasonable settlements to victims, in order to put all of this behind it. This is a blemish on one of the greatest firms.

February 14 , 2023 Update: At the hearing held today in New Jersey, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Michael Kaplan announced his intention to follow the third U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruling to dismiss the bankruptcy case.