You May be Entitled to Significant Compensation Is talc dangerous. Johnson & Johnson powders were proven to contain asbestos (a cancer causing agent) and the company failed to notify users of the cancer risk. $2 BILLION has already been awarded to claims. Free To File! No Fees Unless A Settlement Is Awarded!

J&J’s proposed talc settlement would pay $440 million US state AGs. Is Talc Dangerous .

Johnson & Johnson (JNJ.N) has put aside $400 million to settle U.S. state consumer protection actions as part of a larger $8.9 billion settlement of allegations that its Baby Powder as well as other talc ingredients cause cancer. Is talc dangerous.

J&J company subsidiary LTL Management filed a bankruptcy plan in New Jersey late on Monday which outlines how the company will pay various types of cancer victims as part of a bankruptcy settlement. Is talc dangerous. J&J has stated that its Talc products are safe, and will not cause cancer. The company is trying for the second time to end more than 38,000 lawsuits filed in bankruptcy, as well as prevent new lawsuits from coming forward in the future.
The bankruptcy plan of LTL would pay $400 million into an additional trust to settle claims brought with state attorneys general alleging that J&J was in violation of the state’s unfair commercial practices as well as consumer protection laws through misleading consumers regarding the dangers of its talc products.

Many states had initiated consumer protection actions against J&J before LTL’s first bankruptcy filing prevented those investigations from taking place in 2021. Is talc dangerous. New Mexico and Mississippi had already filed suit in the past against Johnson & Johnson before then, and the states of Arizona, Maryland, North Carolina, Texas and Washington had issued civil investigative requests or subpoenas according to court documents.

New Mexico and Mississippi have filed a petition to end LTL’s bankruptcy, joining cancer victims and The U.S. Justice Department’s bankruptcy watchdog. They have claimed that a lucrative company such as J&J does not qualify for bankruptcy protections aimed at those struggling with debt.
LTL’s first attempt at resolving the bankruptcy cases was rejected after the same arguments. The U.S. appeals court ruled in favor of LTL was not in “financial trouble” and thus not eligible to receive bankruptcy relief. Is talc dangerous. LTL declared bankruptcy a second time just over two hours after the decision to dismiss, arguing that the second bankruptcy was different due to the fact that it had less money and more support for the possibility of settling.

New Mexico and Mississippi said in their motion to dismiss LTL’s new bankruptcy violates the law enforcement powers of the state by attempting unilaterally to cap the liability of the company in state consumer protection laws.

Is Talc Dangerous

LTL’s new filings also included additional details about the way in which the company will evaluate and pay cancer claims when the bankruptcy plan is approved.

The highest payments under the settlement will be $500,000 for people diagnosed with mesothelioma that is terminal before age 45, and $260,000 for people diagnosed with ovarian cancer that is terminal before age 45.

From there, the proposed settlement will offer discounts based on the kind and severity of cancer, an individual’s age, the history of the use of talc, and other aspects. Is talc dangerous. For instance someone who regularly used daily talc products, had an ovarian cancer family history, cancer, and was diagnosed with Stage II cancer of the ovary at age 55 could be in line for a $21,125 payment under the plan.

Judge orders J&J, talc opponents to discuss settlement negotiations.

Following another round of hearings in Johnson &Johnson’s attempt to utilize a Texas Two-Step bankruptcy strategy to resolve talc litigation and federal bankruptcy judge Michael Kaplan has ordered the company and those opposing the strategy to engage in negotiations to settle the matter, Bloomberg reports.

With its second bankruptcy attempt for LTL management, a subsidiary founded by J&J to settle claims – the company offered a settlement amounting to $8.9 billion. Is talc dangerous. While one group of law firms representing plaintiffs supports the deal, another group is opposed to the offer.

In the last week, an opposition group, called the Official Committee of Talc Claimants, urged the bankruptcy court to disqualify the petition argument that LTL is not a factor in financial distress.

“The filing is an unjust and legally flawed attempt by a handful of law firms to try to prevent claimants from voting on the resolution plan – a plan that the overwhelming majority of claimants support,” J&J’s litigation chief Erik Haas, said in a statement. Is talc dangerous. “The law firms that are behind these filings have interests in finance that are in conflict with, differ from and are in opposition to the interests that their customers. We’ll submit an appeal in the appeals court.”

Is talc dangerous. Clay Thompson, a lawyer for MRHFM that boasts more than patients with mesothelioma who have sued J&J claimed that the second bankruptcy attempt of J&J is likely to fail.

“J&J issues press releases about how wonderful its plan is, while insisting that the plan’s details, including what the individual sick individuals would receive–be kept secret,” Thompson said in an email. “What does the company have to keep secret?”

talcumpowdercancerlawsuit

Kaplan has commanded the parties to create a arrangement plan under the oversight of two mediators.

On February 20, 2022 Kaplan stated that J&J’s recourse to Chapter 11 to hasten a settlement that would free the company from the thousands of lawsuits regarding its talcum products.

But in January of this year, a federal appeals court overturned the decision, ruling that the firm could not be considered in “financial distress.”

After J&J’s contest the U.S. Supreme Court was denied on April 1, J&J filed for its second bankruptcy roughly two hours later. In response, Kaplan froze the lawsuits for 60 days to decide whether or not to accept to file for bankruptcy again.

J&J’s omnipotent profit engine fails after $6.9B the talc litigation cost.

With Two Chapter 11 attempts, J&J has gotten 19 months of which cases were placed held. Is talc dangerous. The company is requesting that claimants decide whether they want to accept the settlement. J&J needs 75% approval in order for the agreement to be accepted.

In addition to the gang of talc attorneys who have panned the company’s bankruptcy play, the U.S. Trustee, a branch from the U.S. Department of Justice, also filed a motion to dismiss the second bankruptcy case of LTL.

In a statement this week, U.S. Trustee Andrew R. Vara wrote that the doors of bankruptcy are “open to honest, but naive debtors.” The doors “are not accessible to those that don’t have a legitimate bankruptcy purpose or that seek to use bankruptcy to hinder or delay their creditors,” Vara continued.

In its own words, J&J maintains there is no evidence conclusive that its Talc-based products, such as its famous baby powder, can cause cancer. J&J has adopted the products of the market, first for North America in 2020–and the rest of the world next year.

J&J seeks to avoid the cost of going to court. The company has won the majority of cases that have been resolved during trial, however, some losses have been very punishing.
A well-known trial in Missouri resulted in an $4.7 billion verdict against the drugmaker, which was later reduced to $2.1 billion following appeals.

Johnson & Johnson faces high-stakes hearing over ‘Texas Two Step’ talc strategy: report
In all, J&J has lost nine talc trials that are either appealing or settled. Out of 41 trials, 32 ended with the favor of J&J or a mistrial, or plaintiff verdicts that were annulled upon appeal. Is talc dangerous. The company also in 2020 moved to settle nearly 1000 cases for 100 million dollars, Bloomberg published at the time.

Talcum Baby Powder Ovarian Cancer Lawsuit – Is Talc Dangerous

Our lawyers handle baby powder lawsuits in all 50 states. The lawsuits involving talcum powder for Johnson & Johnson have been in the process for several years. Is talc dangerous. The lawsuits claim that the long-term use of talcum powder (or “talc”), the active ingredient found in products such as the Baby Powder or Shower to Shower, can cause ovarian cancer in some women.

This page offers the J&J Talc Power litigation update and explains how the forthcoming bankruptcy ruling affects the final settlement amount of the Ovarian Cancer lawsuits.

Did the deadline expire for you to bring a talcum lawsuit? Many who believe the statute of limitations has run out to file a lawsuit against Johnson & Johnson are wrong. Call us at 800-553-882 or request a free and quick review of your case online.

Johnson and Johnson Talcum Powder Lawsuit Update 2023 – Is Talc Dangerous

June 2 2023 Update: At the asbestos talc trial in California yesterday, a few technical issues disrupted the opening speech of defense lawyers. Is talc dangerous. Jurors from home on Zoom, did hear Johnson & Johnson’s lawyer expressing doubt about the science of the 70s that claimed asbestos was present in their product before the trial was abruptly closed.

The plaintiff had the opportunity to present an initial witness Arthur Langer. Langer said that the presence of other minerals alongside talc is expected. He said that his team informed J&J in the year 1971 of the presence of asbestos chrysotile in the talc of the company, but in lesser than 0.1 percent. He also uncovered more asbestos in 1976.

June 1st, 2023 Update Is talc dangerous. This is the first court trial that has taken place since J&J has decided to separate its Talc division and declare bankruptcy marks a pivotal moment in the ongoing talc litigation drama. The trial began on Tuesday in the heartbreaking case of a young 24 year-old plaintiff who was diagnosed with a rare and aggressive type of mesothelioma in the past year, an illness that lawyers on both sides of the argument agree is a grave tragedy.

Opening statements revealed sharp differences in the two sides’ story. The attorney for the plaintiff took aim at Johnson & Johnson, alleging the use of deceptive strategies in its research practices as well as throughout the litigation procedure. The attorney claims that, according to the company attempted to manipulate asbestos’ definition, in spite of internal documents from the year 1978 and 1994 indicating that asbestos fibers found in plaintiff’s tissue are included.

Johnson &J’s tangled $8.9 billion settlement is hanging in the balance with the course of this trial. Despite the particularity of the mesothelioma trial and its distinctive issues in comparison to the majority of talcum powder lawsuits and a decision in favor of the plaintiff could result in a serious setback to J&J’s hopes for broad acceptance of their proposed settlement with plaintiffs.

May 31st, 2023: Update from Johnson & Johnson’s bankrupt talc unit is defending the second Chapter 11 filing in the face of challenges from the talc injury plaintiffs. In an objection submitted to the New Jersey bankruptcy court, it argued that the case differed fundamentally from the prior filing. The subsidiary emphasized the record-breaking commitment of $8.9 billion by J&J which is the largest settlement ever made in the history of a mass tort bankruptcy. Is talc dangerous. There was no mention of how this amount signifies that it’s an equitable settlement. J&J also claimed support from numerous plaintiffs’ law firms representing over the 60,000 plaintiffs. This is not easy to confirm but it’s likely to be false.

May 24 2023 Update: In the wake of Johnson &J Johnson’s bankruptcy filing, the very first trial concerning its cosmetic talc products that are believed to comprised of asbestos is set to commence jury selection on Monday, May 24, California at Alameda County Superior Court, a historically good court for plaintiffs. Plaintiff claims that mesothelioma resulted from asbestos exposure in J&J’s product which J&J has denied. The trial also involves six retailers accused of selling talc-containing products.

May 22nd, 2023 Update: Lawyers in the 2nd J&J talc bankruptcy are now fighting over who should be appointed to the role of future claims representative, an important role essential in resolving the Talc claims. Is talc dangerous. Randi Ellis, a lawyer who frequently appears in MDLs throughout the country was appointed as the claims representative in the previous bankruptcy. J&J’s defense group wants Ellis to be appointed to this position again, but lawyers for the talc plaintiffs are protesting on the grounds that Ellis has an unrelated conflict of interest which would prohibit her from being appointed to that post in the future. The dispute stems from fact that Ellis was involved in drafting the hotly litigated second bankruptcy, which raises questions about her ability to be neutral. The reality is this bankruptcy is likely to be dismissed regardless.

May 17th, 2023 Update: The pretend company that J&J created for the talc litigation bankruptcy has informed the New Jersey bankruptcy court that they have allocated $400 million to settle allegations made by states who accuse the company of deceitful advertising for its talc product. Is talc dangerous. So that makes it an $8.5 billion settlement for cancer patients. It is hard to imagine any scenario in which J&J will be able to push the baby powder settlements in these figures. Although J&J’s $8.5 billion offer seems like a lot initially, it will not appear appealing when you do the math. The settlement plan based on our estimates – will not pay victims much more than an average settlement $100,000 per case. It’s not enough.

May 15th, 2023, Update J&J might be facing suit from an advocacy group representing cancer victims. Is talc dangerous. The group contends that J&J deliberately withdrew a $61.5 billion financing agreement with its subsidiary, LTL Management LLC, in order to create a false sense of financial distress and confirm the unit’s Chapter 11 bankruptcy filing. The group argues that this act could be interpreted as a fraudulent transfer of the rights of victims’ compensation. They intend to investigate J&J’s actions after the announcement of the denial of the LTL’s bankruptcy case in its first instance.

May 10 2023 Update: During the next week, the U.S. Bankruptcy Court in New Jersey will hear oral arguments in a motion dismiss the second bankruptcy petition filed by J&J subsidiaries LTL Management. In the meantime, however LTL Management has filed an order which requires both sides to participate in a settlement mediation to see if an international settlement agreement can be reached.

May 5 2023 Update: The talc producer Whittaker, Clark & Daniels filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy due to numerous lawsuits alleging that its Talc products caused cancer from asbestos exposure. Is talc dangerous. More than 2700 people have filed lawsuits against the firm and it has been spending $1 million a month on legal defense. The company’s recent $29 million verdict on the state of South Carolina forced it to file for bankruptcy protection, arguing for equitable distribution of assets to talc claimants, rather than being taken over in the hands of the receiver. Other suppliers of talc have declared bankruptcy because of lawsuits.

May 4 2023 Update U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Michael Kaplan has directed Johnson & Johnson to relaunch talks with lawyers who have rejected Johnson & Johnson’s $8.9 billion deal. At Trenton, New Jersey yesterday, the parties appeared in court to discuss next steps in this second case of bankruptcy and Judge Kaplan has pushed for further settlement talks.

This is the answer to resolve the claims of J&J. A settlement for baby powder can be completed. Is talc dangerous. But it’ll need additional money – perhaps billions of dollars by Johnson & Johnson.

Lawyers are divided over whether or not to accept the plan and not every client sees the issue in the same manner their lawyer does. Second bankruptcy cases are bound to fail, and Judge Kaplan has scheduled a hearing in June to determine if she will dismiss the bankruptcy for the second time.

May 3, 2023 Update: A group representing cancer patients suing Johnson & Johnson (J&J) demanded that the Third Circuit halt the bankruptcy filed by J&J subsidiary LTL Management, claiming it is a bid to stop litigation over talc products. The group of talc claimants has filed a motion this week requesting the Third Circuit to consider their case and to send it back before a court of lower jurisdiction with instructions for dismissing the bankruptcy. Is talc dangerous. The committee also requested that the stopped tort litigation against J&J continue to proceed.
LTL requested Chapter 11 protection once again following its bankruptcy filing that was denied by the Third Circuit earlier this year with an $8.9 billion payment. The committee believes that the recent ruling, which allows LTL’s 2nd Chapter 11 to continue, in addition to halting trials against J&J, warrants the immediate Third Circuit review. The US Trustee requested it be requested that the New Jersey bankruptcy court dismiss the LTL bankruptcy case. J&J’s global vice-president of litigation, Erik Haas, was quoted by Bloomberg declaring that J&J plans to file a formal response to the appeals court saying that the filing is an “desperate and legally insufficient attempt” by a small number of law firms that have competing financial interests.
May 1 2023 Update: A frequently asked question is how the plaintiffs’ lawyers and their clients turn around $8.9 billion. Of course, that is an immense amount of money. But there are a lot of victims. Is talc dangerous. These are actually a good claims for plaintiffs. We were reminded recently in two talc trials which ended in large verdicts for the plaintiffs. In February mesothelioma cases, a talcum powder trial in Oregon ended in the verdict in the amount of $18.1 million. A month later, another mesothelioma-related talc case went to trial in South Carolina and resulted in the verdict of $29 million on behalf of the plaintiff. The defendant in both cases was Whittaker, Clark & Daniels Inc., one of the most prominent suppliers of talc in the U.S.
April 30th 2023 Update: In the year 2023, when J&J first tried to bring the lawsuit over talcum powder into bankruptcy, it did so with the option of putting aside $2 billion for settlements. The sum was ridiculously low. All of the talc plaintiffs agreed with it. However, this time, J&J has increased the offer to $8.9 If the talc plaintiffs agree to a bankruptcy settlement and also has the backing of a significant part of the talc-related plaintiffs as well as their lawyers. Is talc dangerous. But 75% of the plaintiffs of talc are required for bankruptcy plan approval is not an easy task since there are so many lawyers with vast stocks of baby powder lawsuits opposed towards the agreement.

What can be done to end the impasse? More billions.
April 25 2023 Update: Talc patients have demanded a judge dismiss their Chapter 11 case filed by LTL Management LLC, a absurdly-made-up Johnson & Johnson subsidiary, declaring that the company isn’t financially strained. LTL has filed for Chapter 11 to settle tens of thousands of claims that J&J’s baby-powders caused cancer. Is talc dangerous. The 3rd Circuit dismissed its first Chapter 11 case in January and said that the company was not eligible for bankruptcy relief as it had not demonstrated financial distress.

The claimants assert that the third Chapter 11 case is an fraud on the bankruptcy system, and that it is being pursued in bad good faith. J&J states that the bankruptcy settlement receives “significant backing” from the firms that represent approximately 60,000 plaintiffs. It is fair to say plaintiffs’ lawyers and victims are divided over what they believe is an $8.9 billion deal.

April 21, 2023 Update: A bankruptcy judge has decided in favor of Johnson & Johnson must face new lawsuits claiming that the company sold tainted baby powder causing cancer. While trials in talc lawsuits are paused for at least 60 calendar days but new lawsuits can be filed, and lawyers may begin to prepare their cases. Is talc dangerous. The judge expressed skepticism over J&J’s ridiculous effort to revive its strategy by filing a second bankruptcy trial.

April 13th, 2023 Update: big news is the $8.9 billion over 25 years of settlement. Lawyers representing cancer victims within the MDL group action vowed to fight the settlement alongside those who claim talc. Why? They think it is not enough for 70,000 victims who have cancer. Is talc dangerous. The lawyers say that J&J should negotiate a bigger settlement or pursue individual claims in the event that the latest bankruptcy is dismissed.

But there’s a separate group of lawyers that is not part of the leadership of group action. These lawyers have amassed tens of thousands of cases. This group wants to settle now in what many believe to be less than these victims deserve. The argument they make is two-fold. The first is that they claim the settlement, which is about an average of $100,000 per plaintiff – is fair.

This argument isn’t easy to make. But their second argument has more substance: the victims will be no longer patient and demand the money immediately.

April 12 2023 Update: Some people are seeking out how J&J could file for bankruptcy again. The answer is complex and confusing. But let’s try to explain it simply.
Johnson & Johnson asserts that bankruptcy is the only way to address both present and future talc lawsuits conclusively. That is, it thinks it will pay less in the event of the bankruptcy element which applies pressure to negotiate a settlement. Is talc dangerous. Going back to more than 400 years in American history, the company claims that bankruptcy benefits all parties by distributing settlements more fairly and effectively than trial courts in which some litigants receive substantial payouts, while others are left with nothing.

The essence in the 3rd Circuit decision was this is not a matter of an enterprise that is profitable, forming an affiliate to accept the legal risk and declare bankruptcy – Congress contemplated when drafting the Bankruptcy Code. But it also said the company was financially trouble because J&J assured it of unlimited funding.
This is why J&J jumped on the unlimited funding part of the deal and did not promise that it would provide unlimited funds for the litigation. The company claims that its new financing agreements with its subsidiary address the concerns of the appeals court while supplying funds for claim payments. It’s as if giving victims less money will solve the overarching problem.

Attorneys representing cancer patients who are against the agreement argue this argument by saying that it is countering legal nonsense legal absurdity: J&J fraudulently transferred $50 billion in assets to LTL Management to circumvent the appeals court’s decision. Hyperbole did not go unnoticed: victims’ lawyers call this the biggest “fraudulent deal of assets in United States history.”

Notwithstanding the legal mumbo jumbo, J&J does not really think that the bankruptcy will endure. But it is a way to push for this $8.9 billion settlement, and to keep the pressure on plaintiffs.

April 10, 2023 update: Bloomberg has an interesting article on a new law in New Jersey that is shedding new light on litigation funding in the Class action suit. Funders of litigation Virage Capital Management and TRGP Capital invested in hundreds of claims from Johnson & Johnson (J&J) over talc products in exchange for a share of any profits. J&J has now offered to pay $8.9 billion to settle any lawsuits.

The funders’ involvement is publicly available due to an New Jersey court rule requiring the release of certain details about funding sources outside of the. This rule is intended to address the rising calls for regulation of litigation funders. J&J is facing more than 60,000 claims when you combine federal and state baby powder lawsuits. Third-party funding of mass tort cases is not without its pros and pros and. However, there is no doubt that we are witnessing how third-party financing can help level the playing field between people and big companies in court.

April 4 2023 Update: It is fun to watch the worm turn in this case. J&J has taken another blow this week when they were denied by the Third Circuit denied J&J’s request to maintain the automatic stay during the time that J&J appeals an appeal in the U.S. Supreme Court. This automatic stay froze thousands of talcum powder cases and prevented the filing of new lawsuits ever since J&J started the controversial process to spin the talc liabilities into a bankrupt entity over one year earlier. Is talc dangerous. When the 3rd Circuit ruled that this bankruptcy was not valid some months ago, the stay was removed. J&J wanted to see it continued pending the SCOTUS appeal. But the answer was no.
April 1, 2023 Update: Johnson & Johnson announced it will appeal its 3rd Circuit bankruptcy loss to the U.S. Supreme Court last week. The odds that the Supreme Court is willing even to consider the appeal? Low.
March 16, 2023 Update: with the bankruptcy stay now officially lifted, the first new cases have been filed and transferred into the class action for talcum powder MDL in over one year. Seven new talc lawsuits were joined to the MDL in the past month, bringing the total number of pending cases up to 37,522.

February 25, 2023 Update: A Congressmen from Tennessee has now demanded that The U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) begin an investigation into the amount J&J products containing talc have cost the government over the decades.
A recent email addressed to the GAO, Rep. Steven Cohen (D-Ten.) accused J&J of ignoring the dangers of its talc-based products for long while tax dollars spent on treating people who suffered injuries from exposure to the chemicals. The lawsuit comes just a few weeks after J&J’s major loss in the 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals.

Is talc dangerous. J&J needs to start making reasonable settlement proposals for victims in order getting this behind. It’s a mark on one of the world’s greatest firms.

February 14 2023 Update: During an earlier hearing at the hearing in New Jersey, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Michael Kaplan announced his intention in light of his 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruling to dismiss the bankruptcy case.