Mirena Causing Ovarian Cysts Lawsuit – Are You Eligible To File A Talc Lawsuit?

You May be Entitled to Significant Compensation Mirena causing ovarian cysts lawsuit. Johnson & Johnson powders were proven to contain asbestos (a cancer causing agent) and the company failed to notify users of the cancer risk. $2 BILLION has already been awarded to claims. Free To File! No Fees Unless A Settlement Is Awarded!

J&J’s proposed settlement with talc would make payments of 400 million dollars to US state AGs. Mirena Causing Ovarian Cysts Lawsuit .

Johnson & Johnson (JNJ.N) has set the amount of $400 million for resolving U.S. state consumer protection actions as part of a wider $8.9 billion settlement of allegations that it’s Baby Powder and other talc-based ingredients cause cancer. Mirena causing ovarian cysts lawsuit.

J&J subsidiary LTL Management filed a bankruptcy plan in New Jersey late on Monday which outlines how the company intends to pay different types of cancer victims in an arrangement for bankruptcy. Mirena causing ovarian cysts lawsuit. J&J has declared that its Talc products are safe, and won’t cause cancer. J&J is seeking the second time to end more than 38,000 lawsuits brought in bankruptcy and prevent new cases from being filed in the near future.
LTL’s bankruptcy plan will pay $400 million to a separate trust for claims filed by state attorneys general alleging that J&J did not comply with state unfair business practices as well as consumer protection laws by misinforming consumers regarding the security of its talc-based products.

A number of states had already initiated consumer protection lawsuits against J&J prior to the time that LTL’s bankruptcy filing stopped those investigations from proceeding in 2021. Mirena causing ovarian cysts lawsuit. New Mexico and Mississippi had already launched actions with Johnson & Johnson before then and states like Arizona, Maryland, North Carolina, Texas and Washington had issued subpoenas or civil investigative demands, according to LTL’s court filings.

 

 

New Mexico and Mississippi have filed a petition to end LTL’s bankruptcy in a joint move with cancer victims as well as those affected by cancer and the U.S. Justice Department’s bankruptcy watchdog. argue that a profit-making company such as J&J cannot benefit from bankruptcy protections aimed at those struggling with debt.
The first time LTL attempted to settle the lawsuits in bankruptcy was thrown out after similar arguments. In the end, a U.S. appellate court ruled that LTL had not been in “financial trouble” and ineligible of bankruptcy protection. Mirena causing ovarian cysts lawsuit. LTL declared bankruptcy a second time in just two hours following that dismissal, arguing that its second attempt was different in that it was able to borrow less and had more support for a settlement.

New Mexico and Mississippi said in their motion to dismiss that LTL’s bankruptcy renewal violates the state’s law enforcement authority in attempting to unilaterally limit LTL’s liability to state consumer protection laws.

 

Mirena Causing Ovarian Cysts Lawsuit

LTL’s recent filings also provided more information on the way in which the company will evaluate and settle cancer claims when the bankruptcy plan is approved.

The maximum amount under the settlement will be $500,000 for patients diagnosed with terminal mesothelioma before age 45 and $260,000 for those diagnosed with terminal ovarian cancer before age 45.

From there, the proposed settlement provides discounts based on the kind and severity of the cancer, the person’s age, the history of using talc and other factors. Mirena causing ovarian cysts lawsuit. For instance someone who regularly used talc products weekly, had the family history of ovarian cancer and was diagnosed with the stage 2 ovarian cancer by age 55 could be in line to receive a payout of $21,125 according to the plan.

Judge orders J&J and talc oppositionists to discuss settlement negotiations.

Following another round of hearings in Johnson &Johnson’s attempt to use a Texas Two-Step bankruptcy strategy to resolve talc litigation and federal bankruptcy judge Michael Kaplan has ordered the firm and the people who opposed the plan to hold settlement talks, Bloomberg reports.

With its second bankruptcy attempt for LTL Management, a subsidiary created by J&J to handle the claims company proposed a settlement of $8.9 billion. Mirena causing ovarian cysts lawsuit. While a firm representing plaintiffs supports the proposal, another group opposes the move.

Earlier this week, the opposition group, called the Official Committee of Talc Claimants in the bankruptcy court, demanded for dismissal of the matter saying that LTL cannot be regarded as financially distressed.

“The filing is a desperate and legally deficient attempt by a small number of law firms to stop claimants from voting on the resolution plan – a plan the vast majority of claimants favor,” J&J’s litigation chief Erik Haas, said in an announcement. Mirena causing ovarian cysts lawsuit. “The law firms involved in this filing have financial interests that conflict with, differ from and are in opposition to the interests of their clients. We’ll be submitting a response before the court of appeals.”

Mirena causing ovarian cysts lawsuit. Clay Thompson, a lawyer for MRHFM, which is home to more than patients with mesothelioma who have sued J&J and J&J, has said that J&J’s second bankruptcy attempt is likely to fail.

“J&J publishes press release about how wonderful its plan is, while demanding that plan details–including what each sick person will be treated to,” Thompson said in the statement. “What does the company have to keep secret?”

 

4L 4

 

Kaplan has instructed the sides to devise a second restructuring plan, with the oversight and supervision of mediators.

On February 20, 2022 Kaplan confirmed J&J’s recourse to Chapter 11 to hasten a settlement that would relieve J&J from the thousands of lawsuits over its talcum products.

But in January of this year, a federal appeals court ruled against the verdict, ruling that the business could not be considered to be in “financial trouble.”

After J&J’s appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court was rejected on April 1, J&J filed for its second bankruptcy just two hours later. In response, Kaplan froze the lawsuits for 60 calendar days to decide whether to grant an additional bankruptcy.

J&J’s unstoppable profit engine goes out of control after $6.9B cost of litigation involving talc.

With two Chapter 11 attempts, J&J has gotten 19 months of which the cases were in limbo. Mirena causing ovarian cysts lawsuit. J&J wants the claimants to take a vote to accept their settlement. J&J needs 75% acceptance for the deal to go through.

In addition to the gang of talc lawyers who criticised the company’s bankruptcy, the U.S. Trustee, an arm belonging to the U.S. Department of Justice was also the one to file an appeal to dismiss LTL’s bankruptcy second case.

In a recent filing, U.S. trustee Andrew R. Vara wrote that the doors of bankruptcy are “open to honest but unfortunate debtors.” Those doors “are not accessible to those that don’t have a legitimate bankruptcy reason or want to take advantage of the bankruptcy process to delay or hinder their creditors,” Vara continued.

For its part, J&J maintains there is no proof conclusive that their Talc-based products, such as its iconic baby powder, can cause cancer. J&J has been taking the products of the market first to be available in North America in 2020–and the rest of the world next year.

J&J is determined to stay clear of the cost of going to court. J&J has won the majority of the cases that were decided in court, however some losses have been very punitive.
A highly-publicized trial in Missouri produced an $4.7 billion judgment against the drug manufacturer that was later reduced to $2.1 billion after appeals.

Johnson & Johnson faces high-stakes hearing over ‘Texas Two Step’ talc strategy: report
In all, J&J has lost nine trial involving talc that are being appealed or concluded. Out of 41 trials, 32 ended with a win by J&J as well as mistrials or verdict of a plaintiff annulled in appeal. Mirena causing ovarian cysts lawsuit. Separately, the company in 2020 sought to settle nearly 1,000 cases worth 100 million dollars, Bloomberg reported at the time.

 

Talcum Baby Powder Ovarian Cancer Lawsuit – Mirena Causing Ovarian Cysts Lawsuit

Our lawyers handle baby powder lawsuits across every state. The lawsuits involving talcum powder for Johnson & Johnson have been going on for a long time. Mirena causing ovarian cysts lawsuit. The lawsuits claim that the long-term use of the powder (or “talc”), the active ingredient found in products such as Shower to Shower Powder or Shower to Shower which can cause cancer of the ovary in certain women.

This article provides the J&J update on the talc power litigation and discusses how the upcoming bankruptcy ruling will affect the final settlement amounts in the ovarian cancer lawsuits.

Has the deadline passed for you to file a talcum powder lawsuit? Many people who think the time limit has expired to file a lawsuit against Johnson & Johnson are wrong. Call us at 800-553-882 or request a no-cost and quick case review online.

 

Johnson and Johnson Talcum Powder Lawsuit Update 2023 – Mirena Causing Ovarian Cysts Lawsuit

June 2 2023 Update: At the trial for asbestos-containing talc that took place in California yesterday, some technical glitches interrupted the opening statements made by defense lawyers. Mirena causing ovarian cysts lawsuit. Jurors who were watching at home via Zoom and hearing the Johnson and Johnson’s lawyer express doubt about the science of the 70s asserting the presence of asbestos in their product before the session abruptly ended.

The plaintiff was able to introduce their first witness, Arthur Langer. Langer stated that the presence of other minerals with talc is inevitable. He claimed that his group was notified by J&J in the year 1971 of the presence of chrysotile asbestos within the talc manufactured by the company, though with just 0.1 percent. He also found more asbestos in the year 1976.

June 1, 2023 Update: Mirena causing ovarian cysts lawsuit. First trial after J&J has decided to separate its talc section and declaring bankruptcy is a pivotal moment of the ongoing lawsuit controversy. The trial began on Tuesday in the poignant case of a young, 24-year-old plaintiff, diagnosed with an aggressive and rare form of mesothelioma last year, which lawyers on both sides agree is a tragic loss.

Opening statements laid bare distinct differences between each side’s narrative. The attorney for the plaintiff took aim on Johnson & Johnson, alleging the use of deceitful methods in their research practices as well as throughout the litigation process. The attorney claims that, according to Johnson & Johnson tried to alter the definition of asbestos despite internal documents from the year 1978 and 1994 indicating that asbestos fibers in the tissue of the plaintiffs are included.

Johnson &J’s highly uncertain $8.9 billion settlement offer hangs in the balance with the course of this trial. Despite the particularity of this mesothelioma lawsuit and the unique issues it faces compared to the majority of talcum powder lawsuits A verdict in favor of the plaintiff could cause an enormous setback for J&J’s hopes of broad acceptance of their proposed settlement with plaintiffs.

May 31st, 2023: Update from Johnson and Johnson’s bankrupt talc unit was able to defend it’s Second Chapter 11 filing in the in the face of challenges from the talc injury plaintiffs. In an appeal to the New Jersey bankruptcy court, the company argued that the case differed fundamentally from the first filing. It also emphasized the unprecedented commitment of $8.9 billion by J&J the largest settlement ever made in any bankruptcy case that involves mass tort. Mirena causing ovarian cysts lawsuit. The issue is not discussed: whether the amount of the settlement indicates that it is an equitable settlement. J&J also claimed support from various plaintiffs’ law companies representing over the 60,000 plaintiffs. This is hard to verify but it’s likely to be false.

May 24 2023 Update: As of Johnson &J Johnson’s bankruptcy filing, the very first trial involving its cosmetic talc products allegedly comprised of asbestos is set to begin jury selection on Monday, May 24, California within the Alameda County Superior Court, an historically reliable location for plaintiffs. Plaintiff claims that mesothelioma is the result of asbestos exposure resulting from J&J’s products which J&J has denied. The trial also involves six retailers accused of selling talc-containing products.

May 22nd, 2023 Update Lawyers involved in the second J&J Talc bankruptcy are fighting over who should be chosen to fill the role of the claims representative in the future, which is vitally critical to resolving claim for talc. Mirena causing ovarian cysts lawsuit. Randi Ellis, a lawyer who is frequently involved in MDLs all over the nation was appointed the claims representative in the previous bankruptcy. J&J’s defense team would like Ellis to be appointed to that role and again, but attorneys for the talc plaintiffs have raised objections because Ellis has an interest conflict that would prevent her from being appointed to that post in the future. The conflict stems from the issue that Ellis was involved in the drafting of the highly contesting second bankruptcy, which raises doubts about her capacity to be neutral. The reality is this bankruptcy is likely to be dismissed in the end.

May 17th, 2023 Update: The fake company J&J made up for the talc litigation bankruptcy has informed an New Jersey bankruptcy court that they have allocated $400 million to settle the claims brought by states accusing the company of misleading advertising for its talc product. Mirena causing ovarian cysts lawsuit. That’s an $8.5 billion settlement for cancer patients. It is hard to imagine the scenario in which J&J will be able to push the settlements of baby powder through given these numbers. Although J&J’s $8.5 billion offer might seem like a lot of money at first, it does not appear appealing after you calculate the figures. This settlement proposal – by our rough calculations would not provide victims with much more than an average settlement $100,000 per case. This isn’t enough.

May 15th, 2023 Update J&J might be facing suit from an advocacy group that represents cancer patients. Mirena causing ovarian cysts lawsuit. The group contends that J&J deliberately withdrew the $61.5 billion fund-raising agreement together with its parent company, LTL Management LLC, to simulate financial distress and confirm the unit’s Chapter 11 bankruptcy filing. The group claims this decision could be interpreted as a fraudulent transfer of the victims’ compensation rights. They intend to investigate J&J’s actions in the wake of the denial of the first bankruptcy case of LTL.

May 10 2023 Update: During the next week next week, next week, the U.S. Bankruptcy Court in New Jersey will hear oral arguments on a petition to dismiss the second bankruptcy filing by J&J company LTL Management. In the meantime, however it has approved an Order requiring both sides to participate in a second settlement mediation hoping that it will be possible to reach a global settlement agreement been reached.

May 5th, 2023 Update: Talc provider Whittaker, Clark & Daniels filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy due to numerous lawsuits alleging its talc products caused cancer from asbestos exposure. Mirena causing ovarian cysts lawsuit. More than 2700 people have filed lawsuits against the firm and it has been paying $1 million per month on legal defense. The company’s recent $29million verdict at the Supreme Court of South Carolina forced it to apply for bankruptcy protection and argue for an equitable distribution of assets between the claimants of talc instead of being confiscated by the receiver. Other suppliers of talc have declared bankruptcy because of the litigation.

May 4 2023, Update U.S. Court of Bankruptcy Michael Kaplan has directed Johnson & Johnson to resume negotiations with lawyers who rejected the company’s $8.9 billion settlement offer. In Trenton, New Jersey yesterday the parties appeared in court to discuss next steps for this second case of bankruptcy and Judge Kaplan was pushing for more settlement discussions.

This is the answer to resolve the claims of J&J. A settlement for baby powder can be completed. Mirena causing ovarian cysts lawsuit. However, it’ll require more money – more billions of dollars by Johnson & Johnson.

Lawyers have a split opinion on whether or not to agree with the proposal and not all clients see the issue in the same manner their lawyer does. A second bankruptcy proceeding is bound to fail and Judge Kaplan has scheduled a hearing in June to determine if she will remove the bankruptcy after the second.

May 3 2023 Update: A group representing cancer patients who have sued Johnson & Johnson (J&J) asked that J&J’s Third Circuit halt the bankruptcy filed by J&J subsidiary LTL Management, claiming it attempts to block the litigation surrounding talc-based products. The committee representing talc claimants made a motion Tuesday asking to the Third Circuit to consider their case and to send it back to a lower court with instructions to discharge the bankruptcy. Mirena causing ovarian cysts lawsuit. They also requested that the stopped tort litigation against J&J should be permitted to continue.
LTL filed for Chapter 11 protection once again after its first bankruptcy filing was rejected by the Third Circuit earlier this year which offered a $8.9 billion payment. The committee argues that the recent ruling allowing LTL’s 2nd Chapter 11 to continue, in addition to halting trials against J&J should be subject to an immediate Third Circuit review. The US Trustee requested an New Jersey bankruptcy court dismiss the LTL bankruptcy case. J&J’s global vice president of litigation Erik Haas, was quoted by Bloomberg as saying that J&J intends to file a statement to the appeals court saying that the filing is a “desperate and legally flawed attempt” by a few of law firms who have conflicts of financial interests.
May 1 2023 Update: A most frequently asked question is how the plaintiffs’ lawyers and their clients turn on $8.9 billion. Of course, that is a lot of money. However, there are lots of victims. Mirena causing ovarian cysts lawsuit. And these are really good arguments for plaintiffs. We were reminded of this recently by two talc-related trials that resulted in big verdicts for the plaintiffs. In February mesothelioma, a talcum-based powder trial in Oregon resulted in a verdict that was $18.1 million. A month later, another talc mesothelioma case went to trial in South Carolina and resulted in a verdict of $29 million to the plaintiff. Both cases were defended by Whittaker, Clark & Daniels Inc. one of the top manufacturers of talc in U.S.
April 30 2023 Update: In the year 2023, when J&J initially tried to take the talcum powder litigation into bankruptcy, they came with an offer to put aside $2 billion for settlements. The sum was ridiculously low. None of the talc plaintiffs supported the offer. This time, J&J has increased the offer to $8.9 If the talc plaintiffs agree to a bankruptcy settlement and they also have the support of a substantial section of the talc victims as well as their lawyers. Mirena causing ovarian cysts lawsuit. However, 75% of plaintiffs in the talc category, which is necessary for bankruptcy plan approval, it a tough road with so many lawyers with massive inventory of baby powder lawsuits opposed to the settlement.

What are the solutions to the impasse? More billions.
April 25 2023 update: Talc patients have demanded a judge reject the Chapter 11 case filed by LTL Management LLC, a absurdly made-up Johnson & Johnson subsidiary, saying the company is not financially troubled. LTL filed for Chapter 11 to settle tens of thousands of claims that J&J’s baby products caused cancer. Mirena causing ovarian cysts lawsuit. The 3rd Circuit dismissed its first Chapter 11 case in January, saying the company was not eligible for bankruptcy relief since it had not demonstrated financial distress.

The claimants argue that LTL’s 2nd Chapter 11 case is an misuse of the bankruptcy system and that it’s being pursued in bad good faith. J&J asserts that the bankruptcy settlement has “significant backing” from the firms that represent approximately 60,000 people who are claiming. It’s safe to say that plaintiffs’ lawyers and victims ‘ lawyers are divided on their disagreement over the $8.9 billion amount of settlement offered.

April 21st, 2023 Update A bankruptcy judge has ruled the company Johnson & Johnson must face new lawsuits alleging that the firm sold tainted baby powder causing cancer. Although the trials for the talc lawsuits have been suspended for a minimum of 60 days but new lawsuits can be filed, and lawyers will begin preparing their cases. Mirena causing ovarian cysts lawsuit. Judges expressed skepticism about J&J’s pathetic attempt to revive its strategy with the second bankruptcy case.

April 13 2023 update: the major story is that there’s an $8.9 billion over the course of 25 year period settlement offered. Lawyers representing cancer victims within the MDL collective action promised to challenge the settlement the talc claimants. Why? They argue that it’s too little money for the those suffering from cancer who are 70,000. Mirena causing ovarian cysts lawsuit. The lawyers say that J&J should negotiate a bigger settlement or pursue individual claims if the latest bankruptcy is dismissed.

But there is another group of lawyers that is not part of the leadership of this class action. The lawyers collectively have accumulated hundreds of thousands of cases. They want to settle now in what many believe to be lower than what the victims should be paid. Their argument is twofold. First, they argue that the settlement of around 100 million dollars on average per plaintiff is fair.

This is an argument that is difficult to prove. The second argument is more force: the victims can be no longer patient and demand their money today.

April 12 2023 Update: Some people are wondering if J&J is able to file for bankruptcy once more. The answer is complicated and complicated. But let’s try to explain it clearly.
Johnson & Johnson asserts that bankruptcy is the only way to resolve both current and future lawsuits involving talc conclusively. In other words, it believes it can pay less if there is an element of bankruptcy that puts pressure to negotiate a settlement. Mirena causing ovarian cysts lawsuit. In a quest to cover hundreds of years of American history, the company believes that bankruptcy is beneficial to all parties as it distributes settlements more fairly and efficiently than trial courts, where litigants are awarded significant award while others do not.

The main thrust of the 3rd Circuit decision was this is not a case – a profitable company making an entity to assume the legal responsibility and declare bankruptcy Congress considered when it was drafting the Bankruptcy Code. It also clarified the company was financially crisis due to the fact that J&J assured it of unlimited funding.
This is why J&J decided to go with the funding unlimited part of the agreement and did not promise to offer unlimited funding for cases. The company claims that new financing agreements with its subsidiary addresses the appeals court’s concerns while still supplying funds for claim payments. As if providing victims with less money will solve the problem at hand.

Attorneys representing cancer patients who oppose the agreement counter this with what you conclude is countering legal nonsense with legal nonsense: J&J fraudulently transferred $50 billion in assets to LTL Management to circumvent the appeals court’s previous decision. The hyperbole wasn’t spared: victims’ lawyers call it the biggest “fraudulent transfer that has occurred in United States history.”

Notwithstanding the legal mumbo jumbo, J&J does not really think that the bankruptcy will endure. But it is a way of pushing this $8.9 billion settlement and keep pressure on plaintiffs.

April 10 2023 Update Bloomberg offers an informative piece on a law that has been passed of New Jersey that is shedding new light on the funding of litigation in the plaintiffs in the class action. The funders who fund litigation Virage Capital Management and TRGP Capital invested in hundreds of lawsuits in the case of Johnson & Johnson (J&J) concerning talc products in exchange for a share of any winnings. J&J is now offering to pay $8.9 billion in settlements for all lawsuits.

The involvement of funders is public information due to a New Jersey court rule requiring the disclosure of certain information about funders outside the state. The rule aims to respond to the increasing calls for regulation of the litigation funders. J&J is facing more than 60,000 claims when you combine state and federal child powder-related lawsuits. Third-party funding in mass tort claims has its pros and cons. There is no doubt that we are seeing the ways that third-party funding can even the playing field between people and large corporations in court.

April 4 2023 Update: It’s pleasing to see the worm turn in this legal battle. J&J has taken another blow this week when an appeals court in the Third Circuit denied J&J’s request to maintain the automatic stay in the meantime that J&J appeals a bankruptcy decision before the U.S. Supreme Court. It has halted thousands of talcum powder cases and stopped the filing of new lawsuits ever since J&J launched the controversial attempt to spin the talc debts off into a bankrupt subsidiary more than one year back. Mirena causing ovarian cysts lawsuit. When the 3rd Circuit ruled that this bankruptcy was invalid just a few months ago the stay was removed. J&J wanted to see it continue in the meantime of the SCOTUS appeal. But the answer was no.
April 1st, 2023 Update Johnson & Johnson announced it will appeal its 3rd Circuit bankruptcy loss to the U.S. Supreme Court last week. The chance for the Supreme Court is willing even to hear the appeal? Low.
March 16 2023 Update: With the bankruptcy stay officially lifted, the very first new cases were filed and incorporated into the class action for talcum powder MDL within a year. Seven new talc cases were included in the MDL during the month of March and brought the total number of cases pending to 37,522.

February 25, 2023 Update This morning, a Congressmen from Tennessee is now requesting that the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) initiate an investigation into how much J&J Talc products have cost the government in the many years.
Recently, in an open letter to the GAO, Rep. Steven Cohen (D-Ten.) accused J&J of not recognizing the risks of its talc-based products for long while tax dollars spent treating those injured by exposure to the products. The lawsuit comes just a few weeks after J&J’s loss to the 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals.

Mirena causing ovarian cysts lawsuit. J&J must begin making reasonable settlements to victims to begin getting this behind it. This is a blemish on one of the most prestigious firms.

February 14 2023 Update: At the hearing held today at the hearing in New Jersey, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Michael Kaplan announced his intention in light of the third U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruling to dismiss the bankruptcy case.

 

You May be Entitled to Significant Compensation Mirena causing ovarian cysts lawsuit. Johnson & Johnson powders were proven to contain asbestos (a cancer causing agent) and the company failed to notify users of the cancer risk. $2 BILLION has already been awarded to claims. Free To File! No Fees Unless A Settlement Is Awarded!

 

  • Divorce Las Vegas Online – Cheap Online Divorce Lawyers Near Me
  • What The Best Online Divorce Site – Cheap Online Divorce Lawyers Near Me
  • Johnson Law Group Settlement Essure – Are You Eligible To File A Talc Lawsuit?
  • File For Divorce In Ar Online – Cheap Online Divorce Lawyers Near Me
  • Maybelline Pressed Powder Contain Talc Asbestos – Are You Eligible To File A Talc Lawsuit?
  • Get Divorce Online – Cheap Online Divorce Lawyers Near Me
  • Human Nature Talc Free Baby Powder Review – Are You Eligible To File A Talc Lawsuit?
  • File Online Divorce – Cheap Online Divorce Lawyers Near Me
  • Johnsons Talc And Ovarian Cancer – Are You Eligible To File A Talc Lawsuit?
  • Divorce Papers Ky Online – Cheap Online Divorce Lawyers Near Me
  •  

  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Finding A Good Divorce Lawyer
  • About
  • Disclosure
  •  

    >>> Mirena Causing Ovarian Cysts Lawsuit

    You May Also Like